Still down with this nasty cold & couldn't make it out for Tour de Fat today, so I rode down the street and did a little test riding at the LBS instead.
Was mildly annoyed to discover that WSD bikes fit me better, what with me being built like a person that fits on WSD bikes and all![]()
The nice bike shop man kept showing me aluminum women's road bikes and I kept wandering over to the steel touring bikes...
I rode a Specialized Dolce Comp Compact(57cm), a Trek Lexa SL (56cm), and a Trek 7.5 FX (19"). I especially wanted to try the Salsa Casseroll and the Surly LHT but the guy really didn't want to put me on them. I finally got him to let me try the Salsa Vaya (57cm).
I see his point that the top tube on a non-WSD bike is going to tend to be too long for me in a standard build (his reasoning for me not to want a Casseroll or LHT), but I hardly think it's an insurmountable obstacle.
OK, just checked. Effective top tube length on the WSD bikes I rode was 55.3 - 55.6cm, as opposed to 57cm on the Vaya, which did feel too long. But Casserolls don't come in 57 anyway, and I think a different stem on a 56 could take care of the 4mm difference, yes? (how much fudging IS reasonable, o sage cyclists?)
Surly runs longer, their 56cm frame has an ETT of 57cm, so that could potentially be a problem. OK, maybe no LHT or Cross Check for me.
I did decide that I prefer steelAlthough I liked being able to toss the aluminum bikes up on my shoulder to walk across the street.
Hmm. Going to have to try riding those Jamis Codas I was looking at next. The 18" WSD is only 54.0 cm and the 19" non-WSD is 57.0 cm.
In conclusion...
Math is hard. Riding bikes is fun!



Although I liked being able to toss the aluminum bikes up on my shoulder to walk across the street.
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks