-
These types of signals are a waste of money that better spent on better infrastructure. I thought HAWK Beacons are a better option, until I witnessed a car ignoring its 4 solid red lights and speeding(~35-40 MPH) while a lady and her kid were waiting to cross. They had the walk signal at the time, but luckily she looked before crossing. This was in Vienna, Maple Ave(RT123), 3 blocks west of the W&OD intersection(Street View here).
-

Originally Posted by
n18
These types of signals are a waste of money that better spent on better infrastructure. I thought
HAWK Beacons are a better option, until I witnessed a car ignoring its 4 solid red lights and speeding(~35-40 MPH) while a lady and her kid were waiting to cross. They had the walk signal at the time, but luckily she looked before crossing.
yes, there's no safe way for pedestrians to cross large high speed roads. the options are 1) slow down the cars 2) design unsafe crossings 3) get rid of the pedestrians.
-

Originally Posted by
mstone
yes, there's no safe way for pedestrians to cross large high speed roads. the options are 1) slow down the cars 2) design unsafe crossings 3) get rid of the pedestrians.
I really like option #1, but it would require major re-education camps for those pesky drivers. Maybe shock collars for when they are speeding?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes, 0 ELITE
-

Originally Posted by
consularrider
I really like option #1, but it would require major re-education camps for those pesky drivers. Maybe shock collars for when they are speeding?
no, it just requires redesigning the roads. but since that would affect vehicle level of service metrics, it can't be done.
-

Originally Posted by
mstone
no, it just requires redesigning the roads. but since that would affect vehicle level of service metrics, it can't be done.
Some roads get redesigned. It just takes way more effort by advocates than it should.
-
OP here, posting a update.
As I mentioned, I followed the advice of the non-emergency dispatch and filed a report. I described the events, and provided the license plate, and said I had video to share. After a week, I had gotten no response so I called to get the case number and assigned detective. I decided to wait another week. After two weeks, still nothing from police, so I emailed the assigned detective. He was polite enough, but it was pretty obvious to me that if I hadn't contacted him I'd have never heard from them. He was quick to point out this was a traffic violation and not a criminal case. I responded, yes, I know. I then asked if having video of the incident would allow the police to issue a traffic citation. That was several weeks ago, and I've not heard from the detective since.
The silent treatment leads me to believe that they probably can issue a citation, but have just about zero interest in doing so. I understand or imagine the reasons why, but being ignored like this has increased my cynicism about the police when it comes to matters of pedestrian and cyclist safety. I've nothing against the detective, but I'd guess his superiors are focused on airbag thefts and loud mufflers.
In the end, I decided not to share the video, knowing there was at least a decent chance what it did or didn't show would be used against me, to make it my fault, or my son's. Sorry there's no happy ending here.
Last edited by EasyRider; 07-13-2022 at 12:03 PM.
-
I'm sorry about your experience and the lack of ACPD response. I would channel my feelings into contacting board members. Quite honestly, might be worth a brief appearance at the public comment period of a Board meeting. Looks like other cities have more "progressive" views on the ability to rely in video evidence.
https://www.arlingtonva.us/Governmen...Board-Meetings
https://bikeportland.org/2015/08/25/...-camera-155736
https://www.quora.com/Can-you-report...-license-plate
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes, 0 ELITE
Bookmarks