-
Thanks for asking how I was Pete
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes, 0
-

Originally Posted by
Steve O
Imagine if 50% of drivers who used the GWMP crashed at a particular location along the parkway. Think they would take action?
Well, while clearly not 50% of the cars, they have not modified the area of the GWMP between boundary channel and Trollheim. It seems that about every three months there are tire tracks scraping up grass going down the hill from the GWMP to the trail and across it (and sometimes the whole car). So, my guess is that no, they will not always fix something, even for cars. If people regularly died due to such accidents, they might. I would prefer they fix such an area with lots of accidents before someone dies. (and that goes both for Trollheim and this region of the trail just south of it. I fear that one day such a car will take out someone on the trail).
-

Originally Posted by
Dewey
Thanks for asking how I was Pete
Sorry for your misfortune Dewey. I truly detest Trollheim. There are folks here that have noted my ability to go out of my way to avoid it, especially on days like yesterday.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes, 0
-
Nuke and pave.
But seriously, not sure the bridge surfaces need to be permeable, let alone wood. Seems like more of an NPS affectation than something based on actual practical needs.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes, 0
-

Originally Posted by
DrP
Well, while clearly not 50% of the cars, they have not modified the area of the GWMP between boundary channel and Trollheim. It seems that about every three months there are tire tracks scraping up grass going down the hill from the GWMP to the trail and across it (and sometimes the whole car). So, my guess is that no, they will not always fix something, even for cars. If people regularly died due to such accidents, they might. I would prefer they fix such an area with lots of accidents before someone dies. (and that goes both for Trollheim and this region of the trail just south of it. I fear that one day such a car will take out someone on the trail).
I'm always aware of the tendency for drivers to lose it and go off the parkway when I ride just south of Trollheim, so I ride quickly and am ready to take (probably ineffective) evasive action. I think a guardrail would be a good idea here. But regarding the road design there, I don't think the road itself is the problem. Roads will always have curves. The problem is that people fly through there at well over the designed speed, even in wet weather.
-

Originally Posted by
huskerdont
I'm always aware of the tendency for drivers to lose it and go off the parkway when I ride just south of Trollheim, so I ride quickly and am ready to take (probably ineffective) evasive action. I think a guardrail would be a good idea here. But regarding the road design there, I don't think the road itself is the problem. Roads will always have curves. The problem is that people fly through there at well over the designed speed, even in wet weather.
The speed limit is *supposed to be* 40mph. In reality, everyone is closer to 55.
I agree, I would feel safer with a barrier. Sad reality is that in the eyes of *some* in power, someone must die to justify the need.
Also, I have noted elsewhere that NPS is using alternatives to wood that maintain the "boardwalk look". Behold a walkway to Assateague:
Last edited by Starduster; 09-12-2018 at 08:43 AM.
-

Originally Posted by
Starduster
Also, I have noted elsewhere that NPS is using alternatives to wood that maintain the "boardwalk look". Behold a walkway to Assateague:

I don't think the issue is "looks", it's how much heavy equipment would be needed to install a more substantial trail. In your picture I'd guess the heavy equipment could have easily been positioned on the adjacent road in the wide open field/swamp.
The real issue is how much of our bike/ped infrastructure is dependent on nature trails, because they're the only spots left that haven't been completely overtaken by cars. It would be nice if we could just take back some of the car space instead of fighting over the nature trails.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes, 0
-

Originally Posted by
mstone
The real issue is how much of our bike/ped infrastructure is dependent on nature trails, because they're the only spots left that haven't been completely overtaken by cars. It would be nice if we could just take back some of the car space instead of fighting over the nature trails.
I've gotten a lot of traction with the argument, at least in Arlington, that we need better on street infrastructure in order to make the trails better.
Neighbor: I hate bikes passing me at top speed on the Custis
Me: I know! Me too. And I hate biking on the Custis. If Arlington put a two-way protected bike lane on the north side of Lee Highway -- in what's currently the right-most westbound lane -- people on bikes would take that (it's less climbing), which would mean the Custis would be more pleasant.
Neighbor: Gosh darn it, you're right! We should do that.
I've had similar conversations about Eads and the MVT, Wilson and the Bluemont Trail, Mason/FMR Drive and the W&OD.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 5 Likes, 0 Dislikes, 0
-
Toasted my #capitalbikeshare #cabi helmet but saved my head when wiping out this afternoon, southbound on the dangerously slippery #mtvernontrail #Trollhiem boardwalk @ Roosevelt bridge turn off @npsgwmp @wabadc #bikedc #bikeva https://t.co/8JJyKQsEMR
Witnessed by @SteveO on our way to the Nats -Marlin game

Sent from my VS501 using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes, 0
-

Originally Posted by
Dewey
Thanks for asking how I was Pete
I wiped out there myself today @Dewey. I wish you a full and speedy recovery.
Sent from my VS501 using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes, 0 Dislikes, 0
Bookmarks