Long Bridge Park: Technically not a bike trail, sort of

Long Bridge Park is currently under construction between Crystal City and the Pentagon, and between Old Jefferson Davis Hwy and Roaches Run. The name derives from the former bridge located where the 14th St. Bridges are found today.

There will be a raised esplanade adjacent to the train tracks. I believe it's intended for pedestrian and bike use. It's not really a bike trail because it doesn't lead anywhere. It will have nice views of the Washington Monument and some of the other famous memorials across the river. On the other side of the esplanade, the county is installing 3 or 4 soccer/multiuse fields. There are tentative plans for an aquatic center on the very NNE end of the park but that won't be available for several years at the earliest.

The esplanade and the fields are due to be completed this summer or fall. Work crews have been building up the embankment for the esplanade. I saw that they have finally laid down a first layer of asphalt over the eventual esplanade. I would guess that it still won't be finished for a couple more months, maybe into late fall.

The Arlington County site has pictures and updates of the park.

The esplanade will connect to Crystal Drive at the south end, with just a short bike ride from there to the MVT connector. It could be a good spot for taking pictures of the monuments and taking in the view of downtown Washington.

There has been ongoing discussion (wishful thinking?) that someday the north end of the esplanade can be connected to the nearby MVT and/or a direct bike route to the 14th St. Bridge, across the river and to East Potomac Park or L'Enfant Plaza. As far as I know, there have been no such formal plans for this, just items on local bike wish lists. But it wouldn't be that difficult to make those bike trail extensions. It would provide an alternate path from Pentagon City to the MVT or the 14th St. Bridge. It could help bike commuters avoid the congestion from pedestrians at Gravelly Point. (Cyclists would also be able to avoid that fine aroma wafting from the portajohns at Gravelly Point too.)

First things first. They have to finish up the park and the esplanade, hopefully by early fall. Then WABA and other organizations and individuals can help to push for those trail extensions. In an ideal world, those would be built next year. In reality, maybe never. Maybe two years? Or maybe even next year? Maybe?

This is probably not a major item for most, but it could be a nice addition to Arlington.

Last I heard was a -tentative- open date of October. But yes, it would be amazingly logical to create a connection to the MVT...and some of the admittedly hard to read drawings almost sort of part way depict such a connection....

Talk it up with whoever will listen. Don't know who owns the land between the MVT and the new park (or do they connect) so finding that out would be job one.

TheWashCycle has included some of these trail connections in his end-of-year bike wish lists, so the ideas are out there. I think the NPS controls most of the area north of the park. They haven't always been so accommodating for cyclists. (They are the reason why there are no CaBi stations on the National Mall.)

The connection to the MVT at the north end of Long Bridge Park is listed on the recent Arlington County bike projects list. But I don't think it's currently funded. The north section of the park and the aquatic center won't be built for a couple years anyway. I doubt the connector could be built before the northern section of the park is finished. That probably won't be until 2013 or later.

As for the southern section of the park, the official website has a new photo gallery, dated June 2011. Work crews are making steady progress. Hard to tell if they are still on track for an October opening date or not. I can't tell either way.

I found this picture of the old Long Bridge from the 19th century. The original bridge was so low that it barely cleared the river. On days like yesterday, the bridge probably would have been under water. The foot path was just feet away from the railroad tracks.

Attachment 367

The official opening is on Sat., November 5, although people have already started running and riding on the esplanade this month. (The temporary fences and Caution tape have been removed.) The esplanade and most of the sidewalks are finished. The turf on the soccer fields is in place but some of the other areas still need to be covered with sod or other plants.

The announcement lists the park's address as 475 Long Bridge Drive (formerly Jefferson Davis Highway), but neither part of that is correct. The road is not Jefferson Davis Highway. It's OLD Jefferson Davis Highway, which is a separate street from Jefferson Davis Highway (Rte. 1 and Rte. 110). The road is still called OJDH and will continue to be called that until next spring. Only then will it officially become Long Bridge Drive.

In any case, you don't want to ride or drive on OJDH/Long Bridge Drive for the time being. The asphalt has been ripped up because of ongoing utility relocation work and lack of maintenance. That pavement will chew up road bike tires and wheels. Mountain bikes are fine but you'll feel the bumps in the road. If you're interested in biking to the new park, ride up to the north end of Crystal Drive where it turns into 12th St. The esplanade connects to Crystal Drive at the bend.

(If you head over there before the official opening, be careful. Work crews leave stacks of building materials, flower pots and uninstalled light poles on the esplanade and sidewalks at night. These can be hazardous if you're not looking in front of you. The views are nice so it's tempting to look at Roaches Run waterfowl sanctuary, the Potomac River, National Airport, the Washington Monument, the Air Force Memorial and National Cathedral while you're there. Yes, you can see all that from the park.)

http://www.arlingtonva.us/department...tOverview.aspx

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PotomacCyclist

I think the NPS controls most of the area north of the park.

---

Oh! Then someone should talk to the NPS fellow who came to the last Arlington BAC meeting! He seemed very helpful and is focusing on bikes and the MVT until January. Maybe he could get the ball rolling...

I've read a couple articles about that north plot recently. It seems that Monument Realty, the developer of the new Boeing regional HQ project to the south of the park, owns the north plot (formerly the site of the Marriott Twin Bridges hotel). The Arlington board approved the Boeing project and the change in the site plan. (The buildings will be 100% office instead of a residential/retail/office mix.) Arlington currently controls the Boeing site. The county will transfer the planned Boeing site to Monument in exchange for the north plot. Until that happens, the County can't build on that north plot. The deal was only just approved last week (?). I don't know how long the land swap will take.

Once that's done, then the County would have the authority to develop that north plot. Whether they will is beyond my knowledge. The County website indicates that the north section and aquatic center are in the planning stage. Construction won't start for a couple years at the earliest. But that's for the aquatic center. Maybe the County could be convinced to move forward on the extension of the esplanade on a quicker schedule.

I'm noticing that all of the relevant parties seem to be coordinating activity so that there is only one major construction project at a time in that area. Phase I of the park is finishing up in early November. Then demolition and prep work is scheduled to start on the Boeing site soon after. (Supposedly before the end of the year.) If that takes two years or less, then that project would finish up before Phase II of the park got started. Or maybe this is just my imagination.

Anyway, the County would need to do some heavy lifting to extend the esplanade. They will have to clear out a lot of trees. (Maybe they can be replanted elsewhere.) Then bulldozers will have to move a lot of earth to build up the base of the esplanade. Then they would add the finishing structure. It took the crews more than a year to finish the first part of the esplanade (while working on the rest of the park at the same time).

After the park opens next month and the Boeing project gets underway, we might get more info about any possible acceleration of the trail extension. The remaining section of the trail is only about a third of the entire length of the esplanade, but they'll have to build an overpass to cross the GW Parkway. I'm not an engineer but I was thinking that maybe they could "piggyback" off to the side of the train bridge. Maybe it doesn't work that way. But I can speculate about this since I'm not getting paid to design anything. It's fun to draw up grand plans on Google Maps. Too bad it's not nearly as easy to build bridges and trails in real life.

There's a group, Friends of Long Bridge Park, that is working to speed up the construction of the bike connection between the park and the Mt. Vernon Trail. They are also trying to support the ongoing planning and construction of the next phase of the park, which will feature the aquatic and indoor athletic center. While the building won't have a velodrome, it will have many other features that can be useful for cyclists who do cross-training and/or triathlons. In addition to the main 50m Olympic and diving pool, there will be other pools available for fitness swimming, aquatic rehabilitation and "splash time" for young kids. The center will have strength training and aerobic equipment, a climbing wall, racquetball courts and an indoor track. (Assuming that the budget allows for this.)

If the building were actually built in the near future, this would be incredible for area residents. I've read that planning won't be finished until 2013, and construction might not be finished until 2015. Anyone out there want to make a big donation and get the project moving faster? Boeing, maybe? They'll be in the neighborhood and they have plenty of money. I think they are already making small contributions to community programs. But I suggest that they be even better neighbors and jump start the funding for the aquatic/fitness center. (It's always nice to spend other people's money. :) )

While the first phase of the park is done, there is a drive to "Complete & Connect" the park. Complete refers to adding more facilities (the sports center and another field), and connect refers to connecting the park to the existing MVT via paths and a bridge.

A make-or-break decision by the Arlington County Board regarding funding to "Complete and connect" Long Bridge Park is imminent. The "Friends of Long Bridge Park" group has been urging the Board to develop a plan to finish all the planned elements of the park, including connecting the Esplanade to the Mt. Vernon bike trail via a bridge across the GW parkway.

Broad public support is the most important key to convincing the Board to include the needed funding this year You can help. Please join the other park constituencies in a mass showing at the next Arlington County Board meeting this Saturday, Feb 11, starting promptly at 8:30 am in the County Board room (third floor of the County office building - 2100 Clarendon Blvd. - free parking - for both cars *and* bikes - in the basement).

Please show up just before 8:30 wearing your biking gear and/or carrying your helmet. This agenda item should be completed in about 30 minutes, so afterwards you can go enjoy the Farmers' Market in the building's parking lot outside.

Please show up and help support the continued progress at Long Bridge!

I attended the County Board Open Door session at Thomas Jefferson Community Center last night to bring up the Long Bridge Park connector, as well as to voice support for all County efforts with regard to cycling improvements and trail maintenance. Chris Zimmerman was the board member at the meeting and said he was fully on board with the Long Bridge connector, but that they needed NPS to work with them to make it happen. Went in full cycling gear, since it was right after my commute. I was the only person there advocating for cycling. I think we should try to attend all of these open door meetings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arlingtonrider

I attended the County Board Open Door session at Thomas Jefferson Community Center last night to bring up the Long Bridge Park connector, as well as to voice support for all County efforts with regard to cycling improvements and trail maintenance. Chris Zimmerman was the board member at the meeting and said he was fully on board with the Long Bridge connector, but that they needed NPS to work with them to make it happen. Went in full cycling gear, since it was right after my commute. I was the only person there advocating for cycling. I think we should try to attend all of these open door meetings.

---

Where do we find the schedule?

The "Open Door Mondays" schedule is accessible from the home page of the county website, www.arlingtonva.us
(from the rotating feature). They're going to be held each Monday in different parts of the county on a rotating schedule, and are a great chance to speak with board members one-on-one. They're also a good opportunity to make friends of people who have concerns in common with us. For example, some of the people there last night expressed concern about cars speeding on 2nd street, an issue that affects cyclists as well.

A research fellow with NPS will work to coordinate safety improvements on the MVT for the next seven months. At a recent Arlington BAC meeting, Tim Bevins said that the environmental assessment was an issue for the MVT connector. The WashCycle had a post about it.

I wasn't at the meeting so I don't know what the exact problem is.

http://www.thewashcycle.com/2012/01/...non-trail.html

A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the 14th Street Bridge Corridor was released last month. It includes two options for an MVT connector. One is a shorter connector with a looped ramp down to the MVT. Another option is for a bike trail along the entire Long Bridge, from the park to D.C. That would also include a side path down to the MVT before the trail continues over to East Potomac Park.

I don't think there are any timelines included in the DEIS. I'm also unsure whether this DEIS is the same document that Bevins referred to. It could be.

http://www.thewashcycle.com/2012/02/...et-bridge.html

Either of the proposed MVT connectors would be very nice for Arlington and D.C. cyclists. If Arlington goes ahead with Phase II of the park, then maybe work can also be done on an MVT connector. At the very least, they could work on the shorter connector. Then if and when the entire Long Bridge is overhauled to upgrade it for high-speed train service, then perhaps a bike trail could be added on the upstream side. (There have been discussions about such upgrades to Long Bridge and the rail network.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JustinW

Broad public support is the most important key to convincing the Board to include the needed funding this year You can help. Please join the other park constituencies in a mass showing at the next Arlington County Board meeting this Saturday, Feb 11, starting promptly at 8:30 am in the County Board room (third floor of the County office building - 2100 Clarendon Blvd. - free parking - for both cars *and* bikes - in the basement).

---

Are you sure about this? I don't see it listed on the County's agenda for this Saturday. See http://arlington.granicus.com/Genera...2&event_id=479

I just want to be sure they are going to discuss this issue before I get out of bed early on Saturday (any time before 10:00 is simply painful to me).

I hear ya on the hour-of-day-on-a-Saturday issue.

The LBP part should be covered in the public comment period that starts @ 8:30am. All of the lovely items (1-23) on the agenda are part of the Consent Items period that starts @ 9am.

Are there any good places to get breakfast near Courthouse Plaza after the LBP part early Saturday? It's pretty hard for people (especially those named Kathy) get up and out that early on a weekend, and some extra incentive might help!

Kathy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arlingtonrider

Are there any good places to get breakfast near Courthouse Plaza after the LBP part early Saturday? It's pretty hard for people (especially those named Kathy) get up and out that early on a weekend, and some extra incentive might help!

Kathy

---

Brooklyn Bagel at Courthouse and Wilson is pretty good, they make a mean egg sandwich. They're cash only so be prepared.

Breakfast at Bayou Bakery tomorrow morning, anyone? I've been wanting to try this place, and a friend reminded me that it is near Courthouse plaza, where we need to have a group together from 8:30 to 9 a.m. to support the Long Bridge park connection. Anyone up for making it a social event after the LBP issue?

p.s. Thanks for the suggestion, Dave K, but I've been waiting to try Bayou Bakery and didn't realize that it was so close to Courthouse Plaza.

Bayou is a good option (try their hot chocolate - high impact!), and usually District Taco has a cart outside that features yummy breakfast burritos. I'm trying to figure out which option is best for me to use to "incentivize" my daughter to attend the Board meeting as well....

It would be great to have her come along! Her evaluation of their hot chocolate would be much appreciated. ;-)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arlingtonrider

Breakfast at Bayou Bakery tomorrow morning, anyone? I've been wanting to try this place, and a friend reminded me that it is near Courthouse plaza, where we need to have a group together from 8:30 to 9 a.m. to support the Long Bridge park connection. Anyone up for making it a social event after the LBP issue?

p.s. Thanks for the suggestion, Dave K, but I've been waiting to try Bayou Bakery and didn't realize that it was so close to Courthouse Plaza.

---

Bayou Bakery is fantastic, you won't be disappointed. I actually didn't realize they had breakfast b/c I've never been there in the morning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PotomacCyclist

They have to finish up the park and the esplanade, hopefully by early fall. Then WABA and other organizations and individuals can help to push for those trail extensions.

---

I say go ahead and push for it now, there's no reason to wait. Getting on the plans as soon as possible is important to getting it sooner rather than much later.

With the growth of the school population in Arlington, there is a very real concern that funding for many future projects will be diverted to school capacity fixes. Anything Parks-related may get left behind as a result, thus the urgency in getting funding approved (or at least moved along towards approval) sooner rather than later.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arlingtonrider

Breakfast at Bayou Bakery tomorrow morning, anyone? I've been wanting to try this place, and a friend reminded me that it is near Courthouse plaza, where we need to have a group together from 8:30 to 9 a.m. to support the Long Bridge park connection. Anyone up for making it a social event after the LBP issue?

p.s. Thanks for the suggestion, Dave K, but I've been waiting to try Bayou Bakery and didn't realize that it was so close to Courthouse Plaza.

---

Sounds like a good time and will force my sorry butt out of bed.:p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KLizotte

Sounds like a good time and will force my sorry butt out of bed.:p

---

And into the crappy weather they are predicting for the morning. :(

I have to admit it - in view of the crappy weather, I'm probably going to drive. The important thing is to show up (free parking), bring or wear something bikey, make some new friends, and show support for an important cause, followed by a fun get together at a New Orleans style bakery before you go home and go to sleep again. You don't have to be fully awake to participate.

I just read in ARLnow that Arlington is planning a day of festivities at LBP on the 4th of July, and it should be a great place to watch fireworks from. It's a wonderful park and will get even better as it develops, but we need a bike connector to the trail. Please show up and give your support for this important connection, and also for hot chocolate and beignets (or whatever else you would like from the Bayou).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WillStewart

I say go ahead and push for it now, there's no reason to wait. Getting on the plans as soon as possible is important to getting it sooner rather than much later.

---

You quoted an 8-month-old post of mine. The park and esplanade have since been finished so of course now is a good time to push for the MVT connector. At the time I wrote the initial post, the County had to focus on completing the first phase of the park. They were not going to build an MVT connector before the esplanade had even been built. That would make no sense. That connector would not have connected to anything at the time.

The park project is now moving onto the next phase, which may include the extension of the esplanade and the aquatic/fitness center. Those would take the path very close to the MVT. Then we'll see if the County continues the path onto the MVT.

I'm pointing all of this out because your post makes it sound like I am somehow opposed to pushing for an MVT connector now. I am not.

*Thanks* to those who made a showing at the Board meeting today. I think there were Arlintonrider and KLizotte sightings (sorry I did not say hi in person, I had to get my daughter off to basketball) and perhaps other bike-folks were there as well.

Overall we had a solid turnout by various park user groups, and while early in the process, I think the Board took note of the interest in properly and fully completing the parks and associated amenities (read: the trail connection to the MVT).

There may be a need in May or June for a larger turnout at a similar meeting, so stay tuned, and if in the mean time you want to express your interest in having a trail connection between LBP and the MVT, please write to the Board.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JustinW

*Thanks* to those who made a showing at the Board meeting today. I think there were Arlintonrider and KLizotte sightings (sorry I did not say hi in person, I had to get my daughter off to basketball) and perhaps other bike-folks were there as well.

Overall we had a solid turnout by various park user groups, and while early in the process, I think the Board took note of the interest in properly and fully completing the parks and associated amenities (read: the trail connection to the MVT).

There may be a need in May or June for a larger turnout at a similar meeting, so stay tuned, and if in the mean time you want to express your interest in having a trail connection between LBP and the MVT, please write to the Board.

---

Yup, that was Arlingtonrider and me. Was thrilled to see so many youngsters out participating in the democratic process (though probably not by choice). I think the council members were surprised by the number of supporters to "complete and connect" the park were there. They even did an informal headcount of those who supported an aquatics center or an indoor soccer field.

To reiterate what Justin alluded to, the council members did say that they are still mulling over the county's capital improvement plan and that the issues for Long Branch wouldn't come up till around May, at which point they invited us all back.

I'm thinking that maybe for the next public meeting we inundate them with cyclists to push for more and better cycling infrastructure (for the entire county). The point was made that the county doesn't control a lot of the roads (rather, VDOT and NPS does) which significantly complicates matters.

Yes, NPS has a veto over any MVT connector. Their research fellow has already complained about the environmental assessment for the connector in recent weeks. (I didn't attend the January meeting so I'm not sure what the exact problem is.) He said that the problem was holding up the connector. I hope it's not some nonsense about aesthetics. A bike/pedestrian ramp from the park to the MVT would probably lie in between the Long Bridge (for trains) and the MetroRail bridge. It's hardly a scenic spot as is.

There are a few trees that would probably have to be cut down to build the connector, but it wouldn't be a massive number.

I did a little CaBi loop yesterday getting groceries yesterday (based on the notification in the other thread of the new station off the park)

The sidewalk on Long Bridge Road (old Old Jefferson Davis Hwy) is finally complete and connected with the ramp path that goes up to the esplanade (the path that overlooks and is parallel with the railroad tracks). The road itself is pave quite nice with good bike lane markings Yay!

But, I feel they made a mistake with the current design and/or execution. I didn't bring my camera with me, or this would be easier to describe, but here it goes. Going downhill from the esplanade to the street, at the very end, the sidewalk makes a sharp left turn to parallel the street. Which is fine for walkers and joggers. But between the sidewalk and the street is newly planted sod&turf, and a curb - the nearest curb cut is a good 200-300 yds back towards the parking lots. Moreover, they've also planted sod in the old Shel Silverstein portion.

So what's going happen, imo, is that people (particularly on bikes) that are going further north (i.e. under Shirley highway to Boundary Channel Highway) are going to cut across all that new grass and create unsightly ruts, something that could have been avoided with a little curb cut right at the junction.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kolohe

I did a little CaBi loop yesterday getting groceries yesterday (based on the notification in the other thread of the new station off the park)

The sidewalk on Long Bridge Road (old Old Jefferson Davis Hwy) is finally complete and connected with the ramp path that goes up to the esplanade (the path that overlooks and is parallel with the railroad tracks). The road itself is pave quite nice with good bike lane markings Yay!

But, I feel they made a mistake with the current design and/or execution. I didn't bring my camera with me, or this would be easier to describe, but here it goes. Going downhill from the esplanade to the street, at the very end, the sidewalk makes a sharp left turn to parallel the street. Which is fine for walkers and joggers. But between the sidewalk and the street is newly planted sod&turf, and a curb - the nearest curb cut is a good 200-300 yds back towards the parking lots. Moreover, they've also planted sod in the old Shel Silverstein portion.

So what's going happen, imo, is that people (particularly on bikes) that are going further north (i.e. under Shirley highway to Boundary Channel Highway) are going to cut across all that new grass and create unsightly ruts, something that could have been avoided with a little curb cut right at the junction.

---

Take a pic and post. County folks have been interesting in helping fix curb cuts...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dasgeh

Take a pic and post. County folks have been interesting in helping fix curb cuts...

---

+1

It seems like that section is only temporary and not intended for through traffic. Wouldn't bike commuters ride along the bike lanes on Long Bridge Drive up to Boundary Channel Drive, instead of riding through the park and then that sidewalk? That small stretch of the road, to the north of the Self Storage building, is going to be a mess during the extended construction period for the aquatic center (scheduled to begin in Q1 2014, I think). There are going to be trucks rolling through there for much of the next two years. It's not going to be pretty, no matter what.

I'd recommend that commuters stay on Long Bridge Drive and not ride through the park. It's faster and more convenient to do that. For casual cyclists on a bike stroll in the park, I don't think many of them will be riding across that small gap. It doesn't make much sense to do that, especially once the truck traffic picks up next year.

Attachment 4115
just a view from above to set the stage
Attachment 4116
and another view from the penultimate turn by the ball field. The foreground used to have a set of jersey barriers (though normally turned aside) and occasional a fence-type barricade. The new sidewalk begins at the turn to the left on the far side of this leg.
Attachment 4117
this is all new, sidewalk, grass and curb.
Attachment 4118
and a view back on the street with the new sidewalk.
Attachment 4119
and the nearest curbcut.

I totes get what your saying, PotomacCyclist. "Express" traffic should probably follow Crystal Drive around as it becomes 12th street and then turn onto Long Bridge Road if one is going on to the Pentagon and etc.
(btw, for the reverse trip, it's not entirely clear if there is a sensor under Long Bridge Road capable of detecting a lone cyclist that wishes to make a left with the light onto 12th.)

But for the 'scenic' or otherwise more casual cyclist, this configuration actively encourages people to either ride on the sidewalk (something we should try to nudge against) or go over the grass to the street. The grass in the foreground of the truck in the first pick (i.e. to the trucks right) looks to be the DMZ between the existing park and the truck driveway for the next phase of construction. (you can see the truck about to turn into this driveway in the second pic). So there still be some room to complete the street, as it were, while they complete the next phase of the park/aquatic center. (and work towards the future when the path on the esplanade goes all the way through to MVT) (and the science fiction future when the path on the south end of the humpback bridge is able to connect to Boundary Channel Drive)

Actually, the Humpback Bridge-Boundary Channel might arrive before the MVT connector. The 395 interchange project is supposed to start up in late 2014 or early 2015. Part of that project is a connection between the Humpback Bridge and Boundary Channel. They are trying to get around the DOD security objections by routing the trail further away from the small DOD building. This will be accomplished by removing one of the on-ramps to 395, freeing up space for the bike path to be moved to the SE and away from the DOD structure.

Thanks for the pics. I just wanted to point out that this is a BEAUTIFUL ride. The AFR Family Ride/Kidical Mass Arlington ride went through there, and I highly recommend it. I wholeheartedly agree that there should be a curb cut at that turn.

Will Dave G see this or will someone from ArlCo/BA send it along? If not, I can.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PotomacCyclist

Actually, the Humpback Bridge-Boundary Channel might arrive before the MVT connector. The 395 interchange project is supposed to start up in late 2014 or early 2015. Part of that project is a connection between the Humpback Bridge and Boundary Channel. They are trying to get around the DOD security objections by routing the trail further away from the small DOD building. This will be accomplished by removing one of the on-ramps to 395, freeing up space for the bike path to be moved to the SE and away from the DOD structure.

---

There is no longer a set timetable for the Boundary Channel Drive/395 Interchange project. The Crystal City BID page refers to the CapTrack site, which is currently being updated. (CapTrack will be unavailable until this summer.)

http://www.crystalcity.org/area/tran...ve-interchange

They include a map showing the potential redesign:

Attachment 5200

I think the bike connector is marked in red on the map.

The interim Arlington Co. webpage states that the County is awaiting 2nd FHWA comments on the project framework document. That update was posted on 9/3/2013. This is Planning phase 2 of 5. (I don't know what each phase entails.) At least the project is still listed as Active.

Project summary:

"The conceptual design development started in early 2011 under a $48,500 contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates. The project goal is to develop plans to manage the future traffic generated by Long Bridge Park, and the existing local and regional traffic generated by the Pentagon and I-395. In addition to Boundary Channel Drive and I-395, the project scope includes connections to Long Bridge Park Drive and U.S. Route 1, and a bicycle connection from the Humpback Bridge to Long Bridge Park. Once preliminary engineering begins, the project will need to be reviewed through VDOT, FHWA, NPS and DOD. The project funding is currently projected for $8 million of local bond money in fiscal 2015. Funding for the project will need to be moved to an earlier fiscal year because of the opening of the aquatics center in fiscal 2016."

http://projects.arlingtonva.us/capit...ts/entry/2/45/


[The aquatics center is on hold, pending a review of the project by County staff, after all of the construction bids came in much higher than expected. Construction on the aquatics center did not begin this winter as planned.]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PotomacCyclist

I think the bike connector is marked in red on the map.

---

Red is the property line, the bike connector is orange (a bit further up from the water than the property line, closer to the existing "desire path".) The connector will of special interest to people biking from DC to the Pentagon, and to those of us (cough cough) who bike from the bus station at the Pentagon to DC via the 14th street bridge.